Sector Participation- What You Need to Know to Stay Ahead
Published: August 13, 2025
This content is for informational purposes only. This should not be construed as solicitation. The general public should consult their financial advisor for additional information related to investment decisions.
Now over four months away from 2025 lows, we judge how different sectors have moved off 2025 lows and where leadership could be emerging

While it is true that sector leadership has remained largely consistent in 2025, it can be important to keep an eye on the health of said leadership from time to time. After all, price will guide us to sectors that are moving in and out of favor, just like your tastebuds draw you to bright red strawberries in the summer and crisp apples in the winter. Recent research has touched quite notably on the “pulse” of market participation as larger names within the market look to have tightened their grip around upside action, so we will take today’s featured article to further that conversation; diving underneath the hood to judge sector participation as we move through August.

As discussed here, lower participation doesn’t always equal lower performance…. But it can be used as a guiding hand when it comes to where you want to be invested. A strong sector with strong participation suggests an advisor may be able to “throw a dart” at a list of actionable names. On the other hand, a strong sector with weak participation warrants further analysis into a more narrow environment, just like how you might inspect your berry container a bit more thoroughly in December than you would in June or July. The Technical Indicator Report page is the home base for participation studies across different universes.

The chart below details the overall change in bullish percent readings (percentage of the universe trading on a PnF buy signal) since the 2025 performance lows on 4/8. Do note that this date won’t necessarily line up exactly with each respective sector's participation low, but does offer an equal starting point for comparison sake. A few interesting points of note:

  • Energy stands as the sector with the most overall participation gained, seeing 40% more stocks trade on buy signals. This hasn’t quite translated to overall performance though (more on that later).
  • Consumer non-cyclicals & communication services saw the lowest gain in participation, but they hold respectively different pictures… largely in part to communication services and its overall resilience so far this year.
  • Other current technical leaders like Technology and Industrials were other big participation gainers, furthering the idea that overall leadership trends continue to expand.

Continuing on, we can then look at overall relative performance between each sector’s respective cap weighted fund vs. that of their equal weighted fund over the same timeframe (4/8/25-8/12/25). Themes here are largely as you would expect (cap weighted options are outperforming their equal-weighted counterparts) but there are a few points of note.  

  • Despite a relatively weak healthcare group seeing nearly 1/4th more participation, weakness from bigger names within the sector have hurt overall performance (think the likes of LLY, UNH, etc.) While we would suggest avoiding the sector as a whole right now, look outside mega-cap names where exposure is needed.
  • On the other end of the spectrum, Technology and Communication Services saw their cap weighted representative best the equal weight option by >8%
    • Traditional Communication names have tailed off while more growth oriented areas have led the way. Focus here despite the headline participation reading being a standout.
    • While technology has largely broadened out (+30% to BP reading) more intense leadership has come from larger names around earnings.

Remember, you can also use individual relative strength charts to judge the representatives against each other. While the exact ideal scale will differ from sector to sector, the chart below details a 1% chart between tech representatives XLK & RSPT. After a largely unproductive sell signal in late 2022, this chart has favored XLK since 3/17/2023. Since that point, XLK has bested RSPT by just under 30%. While this is admittedly a cherrypicked example, keeping tabs on who is leading the charge forwards within a given sector can help fill out the overall picture within your portfolio.

 

Back to report

DISCLOSURE

This report is for Internal Use Only and not for distribution to the public. While we make every effort to be free of errors in this report, it contains data obtained from other sources. We believe these sources to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Investors who use options should read the Options Disclosure Document before making any particular investment decision. Officers or employees of this firm may now or in the future have a position in the stocks mentioned in this report. Dorsey, Wright is a Registered Investment Advisor with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. Copies of Form ADV Part II are available upon request.
Equity prices provided by Thomson-Reuters. Cross Rate prices provided by Tenfore Systems. Option prices provided by OPRA
Copyright © 1995-2026 Dorsey, Wright & Associates, LLC.®
All quotes displayed are delayed 20 minutes
Disclaimer/Terms of Use/Copyright